How and Why of Everything

Friday, March 14, 2014

I want to get married with girl 30 years younger than me.

She is lovely girl, very beautiful, nice, gentle. I think she loves me too, and we want to have a baby together. But sometimes I think I am too old, 55 for third child. Also I'm worrying that I will not live so long to see how my kid is growing up, and be there for him when it needs me. Can you give me your opinion please.

Be happy-content while you can, specially @55 is getting up there... 8-)

I may not be the one to give advise. I do care for a person half my age. I'm 61 and she is now 31. I do not necessarily want marriage, but friendship. Sometimes you may meet a person that something inside you, gives you a undesribable feeling. If you two are really in love, don't let that stop you. but remember if you two have kids, will you be around to dance at there gradution or wedding.

As for me, if my dream friendship would come true for even one minute before I die, I will be happy.

But good luck with a very tough descision. But will your kids call you dad or grandpa.

to solve that , don't have kids.

You do have a good point, but I don't have any kids.

You say she's Thai...are you Thai also, or are you from some other country?

Thirty years is a pretty big age difference but really, age is just a number.

Men become fathers at any age. I think you need to take stock of your health and how likely you are to be around until at least your child would finish college at age 22 or so. Having a parent die while you're in high school or college can really mess you up emotionally and affect your ability to be successful in school. :-( I had a friend who lost both parents during his college years, he had to drop out. (they were in their late 50s and both died of cancer.) OTOH losing a father may not be as awful as you might think if there are plenty of other relatives around to help with raising the kid after you're gone.

That's why I'm worrying.

Go right ahead if that is the way you feel

See a therapist. LOL

Best Answer

That is a great idea!

YES AND YES, YOUR 55 WHEN YOU GET 80 MOST PEOPLE NOW LIVE PASS THAT YEAR, YOUR CHILD WILL BE AND ADULT, YOUR (SON) WILL BE AT THE AGE WHERE HE IS ALL READY SET IN HIS LIFE , OR IF YOU LIVE LONGER, EVEN BETTER, I BELIEVE YOUR CHILD WILL KEEP YOU YOUNG I THINK YOU SHOULD GO FOR IT.

I once knew a guy who fatherd a child in his 60's and lived to raise the child

Lucky bastard!

It is almost inconceivable that you can be enough for her. Highly unlikely.

Think of her...of HER needs...be honest. Love her, let her find someone else, support THEM. There is someone else for you.

She expects a father figure in you, act like one.

Life can be brutal, I don't mean to be.

I wish you the best. If she marries you, you owe her EVERYTHING.

she could be your daughter. ask your self what if our daughter wanted to marry some one your age. how would you truthfully feel

My daughters are older than her, and I thought about it. But she makes me happy, and alive. With her, I feel much younger and better.

i would enjoy time with her but have a kid?? don t know guess have to be in your shoes to know?

Without kid, she can leave me for somebody younger. With kid, she can't leave me, she is poor, but lovely girl. That's the only way I can stay with her for a long time. That's the reason for having a baby together. And happiness too.

1 More Response

go for it..stop over thinking it....

She is 25 years old thai girl, and sometimes I'm not sure she loves me because of me, or because of everything I'm doing for her, lots of holidays, gifts, money, clothes.... But I'm in love with her, and I'm giving everything with pleasure.

yeah, there's that...doesn;t mean she wont love you though..perhaps stop showering her with gifts and trips..i mean, who does that long term anyway>

I SAY YOU'RE QUITE LUCKY.

http://www.experienceproject.com/question-answer/I-Want-To-Get-Married-With-Girl-30-Years-Younger-Than-Me/1928187

I want to date a girl who's over 30 years younger than me. Is that wrong?

James asked 2 years ago

I find myself highly attracted a 21 year old girl. I'm 54 but don't look my age. This girl goes to Harvard, she's not a bimbo, and she is extremely sexy looking. She wants to be a criminal defense Lawyer. I just find her to be so much more attractive than most women my own age. She's got an amazing body and a**, gorgeous face, beautiful skin, and she's smart. Aside from school she works part time at the restaurant I manage. I find myself staring at her and flirting with her, and she seems receptive towards me. Would it be wrong to date her?

Answer

Follow

Watchlist

Best AnswerVoter's Choice

zoom answered 2 years ago

<<"Is that wrong?">> I guess not, if you can afford her.

On the other hand, if you are intelligent, you will pretty quickly tire of the immature young woman that she is. No matter how smart she is, she is very, very immature compared to your age group. That's gonna get a little tiring for you to explain all your generational meanings you draw from.

Also, at age 21, they are very idealistic -- which is tiresome too.

Don't you want to look at someone in their early forties instead? Or are those woman too mature for you?

Source:

PS: At 21 I would NEVER have looked at an old dude with wrinkled hanging down balls. Ugh, no spankyou

4

Comment

Asparagus and Cancer: Is the Myth Real?

While there are many foods that assist the body in resisting diseases, it behooves anyone fighting cancer to investigate any and all claims of foods that are considered cures for cancer. The latest claim to hit the air waves and rumor mills is that asparagus can cure cancer. Asparagus does contain vitamins and minerals that are essential in the fight against cancer.However there is not enough in one serving to do much good. Trying to eat asparagus to fightcancer would be like trying to hold back the ocean with a spoon.

The Positives of Asparagus

Methionine an amino acid found in everything from meat and poultry to sesame seeds, is also found in asparagus. This amino acid in conjunction with folate and vitamin B6, both of which are found in asparagus as well, has been shown to have cancer fighting properties. This was discovered in research published in the American Medical Journal in 2010.

Asparanin A discovered by researchers in China has shown promise as a compound that causes the death of many liver cancer cells. In addition, the anti-oxidant glutathione is another substance that staves off cancer. Asparagus is one of the best food options when it comes to providing this substance to the body. Glutathione also has antiviral properties.

Asparagus is an excellent source of anti-oxidants and it also contains a group of substances collectively called the saponins, known for their anti-inflammatory effect. Research has shown that these two work in concert to reduce stress. Stress, which is a lot more than the usual “stress” that people feel mentally, is not a healthy scenario for people developing cancer.

So even if asparagus is not the panacea of cancer, it only makes sense to include it as part of a healthy, diverse diet.

Another way that asparagus can add to the health of people is that is contains certain substances that aid with menopause, infertility, and loss of libido.

Leukemia vs. Asparagus

Interestingly, there is an amino acid called asparagine. Asparagine is one of the 20 essential amino acids that the body needs to assimilate to sustain its regular function. Unfortunately, it is also essential for the growth of leukemia cells. Elgar, an anti-leukemia drug, is administered to destroy all of the asparagine in the system and thereby starve the cancer cells of an important fuel.

Asparagus happens to be a good source of this amino acid therefore it works in a way that is counter-productive to fighting this type of cancer. All leukemia patients should thus abstain from asparagus and any other source rich in asparagine.

In the End

When anyone recommends eating any one food as a magic bullet to curing anything especiallycancer they do not understand what alternative health is all about. Asparagus is certainly not a miracle cure for cancer. Ingesting large quantities will not provide you with what you are hoping for.

Balance is what alternative health is all about. The followers of this line of thinking understand that there is no one cure for anything. But they do believe that having a balance in their lives will help cure cancer or any other ailment they may have.

There are many fruits and vegetables that are available to be a part of a healthy lifestyle. Eating any one of these will help protect you and your body against cancer. But do not stop there as eating a healthy diet also strengthens the body in its daily fight against many other disease-causing elements. You should never be afraid to keep your body as healthy as possible.

Keep in mind that some people have food allergies, in which case certain foods should be avoided in order to maintain a healthy diet.

Sources:

http://www.naturalnews.com/032074_asparagus_aphrodisiac.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/023368_asparagus_benefits_food.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/029203_lung_cancer_folate.html

http://www.goodhealthwellnessblog.com/210/asparagus-cures-cancer/

http://www.cancerdecisions.com/content/view/391/2/lang,english/

http://physicianswholisten.blogspot.com/2011/06/will-asparagus-cure-c…

http://www.rvita.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6857&s…

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034522_asparagus_cancer_prevention.html#ixzz2OFpN06sL

Sunday, February 23, 2014

"American aircraft carriers were attacked by strange disc-shaped aircraft with Nazi crosses on the side"

Member of events included in the " anthology UFO" , a resident of Ternopol city of Soviet Union Konstantin Yalyarashkovsky first told the "facts" what really happened 62 years ago at the coast of Antarctica, with a squadron of Rear Admiral Richard Byrd
The amazing events that took place in 1947 in Antarctica with the American squadron , were perfectly aware and president of the United States and the Soviet leadership . However, until recently, has been carefully classified. It's not a joke: warships attacked ... by flying saucers.
Russian newspaer "FACTS "was unable to locate and interview the witness of incredible events - 80 -year-old captain of the second rank, retired , a resident of Ternopol Yalyarashkovskim Constantine .

" We were getting closer, about a dozen unidentified aircraft"

With Constantine Yalyarashkovskim , lean, fit and quite cheerful elderly man I met in his apartment Ternopil .
- During World War II I, like all the boys wanted to get to the front, - says the source. - Even added " to myself two years and the beginning of 1945 finished accelerated courses for junior naval officers , signalers. However, in serious fighting I almost did not participate - the war ended. Command drew attention to my knowledge of languages (thanks to the parents - teachers I spoke English, German and French) and sent me to the Allies - in coordination group at the main headquarters of the Naval Forces of the United States. At the end of 1946 with us Colonel Yuri Popovich, I had been involved in the squadron of Rear Admiral Richard Byrd, United States Navy.
Officially, we headed to the “research expedition “to Antarctica for the evaluation and exploration of its mineral resources. But what struck us in the squadron were: aircraft carrier combat aircraft ( fighters, bombers , attack aircraft and reconnaissance ) , destroyers, minesweepers , a couple of submarines , tankers , marines . Voyage was long, and we just left to languish with Yuri from boredom and idleness. Only in the evenings officers gathered in the wardroom carrier and recovered soul: playing cards, smoking, drinking, and talking. And, as we have seen, none of them also really understood why and where we are going.
Once the captain of the destroyer " Murdoch " Cyrus Lafargue , with whom we became friends over a glass mentioned that phrase overheard Admiral Richard Byrd that Argentina surrendered troops allied crews of two German submarines arrived from Antarctica. Our tipsy company immediately put forward the version with a laugh: they say, go look for Nazi base at the South Pole. Bullshit. Although there were many myths then. We talked about that escaped the Nazis built a huge city in South America, settled in ... space, live underground somewhere in the Alps.

In mid- January 1947 American squadron anchored in the Weddell Sea near Antarctica. On the white continent several times landed Marines. Then began research work: planes were aerial photography, geologists, cartographers and forecasters minding their own business.
- Most recently, on television showed a film about the attack on the squadron Byrd, but it is largely inaccurate, and some directors fantasy - shakes his head Konstantin Petrovich . – Attacke on us happened, if my memory serves me, on January 27. We stood on the bridge Yuri - talked, smoked. Then heard the cry of the observer: "Air! To starboard! “And immediately there was a signal to combat anxiety. We were getting closer, literally over the water (rather than emerges from it , as claimed television journalists !) About a dozen unidentified aircrafts. A few seconds later they were already over the squadron and started the attack!
"Drives" shot some red beams, which easily penetrated a thick vehicular armor "
- It was a strange disc-shaped machine with Nazi crosses on the side - continues the source. AND it through nearly two years after the victory over Germany!
Speed and agility in devices were simply awesome! They shot some red rays. Maybe it was a prototype of the modern laser weapons? Rays can easily pierce a thick armor of the ship, with the enemy “wheels " unthinkable could dramatically change course , moving away from our hurricane fire anti-aircraft guns , and even hang over us ... ! From the deck of an aircraft carrier slowly climbed several F- 4 fighters, but in battle they did not have time to enter. Were immediately burned! The Americans tried to pick up a few more times in the air a couple more of fighters, but it was not successful. Uri and myself delivered towards the heavy machine gun bullets. Front of our eyes, the red beam tore gunner hand and burned the deck. USS received significant damage, but then the enemy somehow “behind” us and suffered the full force of the attack on the destroyer “Murdock." Terrible picture - they literally burned it! Fire, explosions, screams, shooting, sailors began to lower the lifeboats ...
Incidentally, the film claimed that the alleged “wheels” was used in the battle some mental weapon - “sailors in pain clutching hands behind the head." Was not it! Just the roar of engines “saucers" over our heads was so powerful that it causes severe pain in the ears. I experienced something similar when taking off near modern jet combat aircraft.
The battle lasted for about ten minutes. Once the destroyer sank, “wheels ", without touching other ships, boats and lifeboats as quickly sped low over the water on the horizon.
- We were all just stunned occurred! - Says Konstantin Petrovich . - American losses amounted sunk by the destroyer “Murdoch ", about a dozen fighters and several hundred dead sailors. Wounded were even more. "Drives" damaged ships, especially our carrier. A couple of days we repaired in an emergency pace. At this time, significantly increased the number of observers, the surviving aircraft were continuously distant air reconnaissance, anti-aircraft guns around the clock were on duty. Fortunately, all was quiet.

http://fakty.ua/20434-amerikanskie-avianoscy-byli-atakovany-strannymi-diskoobraznymi-letatelnymi-apparatami-s-fashistskimi-krestami-na-boku

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Requiem for a quack, part II: Hulda Clark, author of The Cure for All Cancers, died of cancer.

i-41802239f301f6fd2ea9014160f01074-Clark-thumb-450x205-21323.jpg

About a month and half ago, we learned that über-quack Hulda Clark, the woman who said that she had the Cure for All Cancers, had died on September 3, 2009. I was criticized for entitling my post Requiem for a Quack, but, given how Clark’s quackery had contributed to the suffering and deaths of an unknown number of cancer patients, I didn’t really feel too bad about it, although I do realize that the taboo about speaking ill of the recently dead is a strong one.
At the time, I was curious what the cause of Dr. Clark’s death was, because it seemed rather mysterious, being described as the result of a “spinal injury,” with no further description. Then, a reader sent me a scan of Hulda Clark’s death certificate, and this is what it listed as the cause of death:
Multiple myeloma. Cancer of plasma cells, a form of lymphoma.
Don’t believe me? Check out Hulda Clark’s death certificate (certain addresses whited out) for yourself. Even Hulda Clark’s own website admits that she had multiple myeloma:

Dr. Clark helped many people get well, but she couldn’t help herself. Her first symptom was excruciating pain in her arms. Pain medicines were ineffective. It would turn out she had deterioration in her neck vertebrae which was pinching those nerves. Her hands stopped functioning. It would turn out later she had carpal tunnel syndrome. So as soon as Dr. Clark knew there was something wrong, she physically could not use her Syncrometer techniques to investigate it because her hands and arms did not work well enough. Her health deterioration was a mystery.

Well, not really. The cause of her health deterioration, while perhaps a mystery initially, is quite clear now. She had multiple myeloma. It’s also a pretty lame excuse. I mean, come on! Clark “trained” dozens of acolytes to use her Syncrometer. Are they really saying that not a single one of them could use her device, which she claimed as part of the “cure for all cancers,” to cure her cancer, as she claimed she could cure all cancers? Not that it would have done any more good for Clark than it did for any of the cancer patients who misplaced their faith by putting it in her, but the excuse used to explain why Clark died of cancer when she had spent so many years claiming that she could cure it is lame in the extreme. Surely there must have been someone who could have operated the Syncronometer for her! In any case, this is how Hulda Clark’s site describes what happened next:

Dr. Clark could see from her blood tests that she was anemic. She got a transfusion but was uncertain if the anemia was significant because she had occasional anemia all her life. She also saw reduced kidney function. She spent a lot of time trying to figure that out but unbeknownst to her, chasing that clue would not lead anywhere.
She stopped being able to walk without severe pain. Dr. Clark lived with months of severe hip pain before two hip replacement surgeries and three months of rehabilitation let her walk again. Dr. Clark lived with unrelenting nerve pain for over six months before finding a medication that worked. She suffered more than she should have because she wanted to solve her problems herself, even in the face of her severe physical limitations.

In other words, like her patients, Hulda Clark suffered because she eschewed conventional therapy longer than she should have:

Dr. Clark was scheduled for a procedure to fix the vertebrae in her neck. While doing routine blood tests in preparation for the operation, high calcium levels were noted. The surgery was cancelled and the hypercalcemia was treated. Her doctors evaluated all of Dr. Clark’s symptoms and decided multiple myeloma was the best explanation. That is a blood and bone cancer. No biopsy was performed, so it was not one hundred percent certain, but that didn’t matter because the treatment would be the same in any case (monitor calcium and anemia).
Ironically, Dr. Clark documented helping a multiple myeloma sufferer in The Cure For All Advanced Cancers. Perhaps if she had known what to look for earlier she could have better helped herself. But it was too late. In her last few months, Dr. Clark was physically unable to function well. Her family took care of her and was with her when she died peacefully one evening.

It is simply not true that there is no “conventional” treatment for multiple myeloma other than monitoring anemia and hypercalcemia. For patients under 65, the treatment is often high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Hulda Clark, of course, was 80, and thus almost certainly too old for such a harsh regimen to benefit her. However, for such patients, there is a more mild treatment, namely chemotherapy:

If you’re not considered a candidate for stem cell transplantation, your initial therapy is likely to be a combination of melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide — often called MPT — or melphalan, prednisone and bortezomib (Velcade) — often called (MPV). If the side effects are intolerable, melphalan plus prednisone (MP) or lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone are additional options. This type of therapy is typically given for about 12 to 18 months.

Also, ironically enough, thalidomide has fairly recently been shown to be an effective treatment for multiple myeloma. Either Hulda Clark was so debilitated that she couldn’t handle even the standard therapy of thalidomide, which is a pretty mild drug (unless you’re a reproductive-age woman who becomes pregnant and whose child suffers the birth defects thalidomide causes, which Clark clearly was not), or she chose not to have any science-based therapies. Not surprisingly, I suspect the latter. After all, let’s review the titles of some of her books, shall we? There are:

The Cure for All Advanced Cancers (It sounds as though Clark’s cancer was advanced. Why couldn’t her methods cure it? After all, her book says she has the cure for all advanced cancers. Of course, that makes me wonder if maybe she didn’t have the cure for early stage cancers.)
The Cure for All Cancers (Never mind that last comment. Clark suffered from a cancer, period. Why couldn’t she cure it if she really did have the cure for all cancers?)
The Cure for All Diseases. (This is my favorite of all; I mean, shouldn’t we “allopathic doctors” be out of business, other than trauma and orthopedic surgeons if Clark really had the cure for all diseases?)

It also occurs to me that Hulda Clark’s death teaches us something important about quackery. Specifically, it tells us that many of the practitioners are just as deluded and misguided as those whom they lure away from scientific medicine and towards ineffective and even harmful quackery. There are two kinds of alt-med quacks. First, there are the ones who, like Kevin Trudeau, don’t believe at all, ones who are basically con men. Then there are the ones like Hulda Clark, ones who really believe. While the former can do major harm, I fear the latter more. Because they believe the are the more persuasive for it, and, in the case of Hulda Clark, it is clear from her reaction to her deteriorating health that she almost certainly really believed in her pseudoscience. Of course, its lucrative nature probably didn’t hurt, either, but at her core, I suspect that Hulda Clark really did believe that she had the cure for all cancers, even though it was clear from her own end that she didn’t have a clue about cancer. How she could maintain that belief in the absence of any evidence that her woo did anything, in the absence of a single truly “cured” patient? Who knows? Whatever her motivation, she did incalculable harm to her clients and in the end, by rejecting science-based medicine in favor of her own quackery, Clark blew her best chance at treating her cancer and maintaining her quality of life for as long as possible.
I realize that the universe is not fair in any sense of the imagination. All too often, bad people prosper, and good people suffer horrible fates. However, in the case of Hulda Clark, if I believed in divine justice or some sort of karma, I’d have to believe that her end was completely fitting. The woman whose quackery caused so much suffering among cancer patients during her life ultimately succumbed to the very disease she claimed to be able to cure but was not. Having recently watched a love one succumb to stage IV breast cancer, I wouldn’t wish such a fate on anyone–not even Hulda Clark. However, now that it’s happened to her it’s hard not to feel that, just this once, there were a certain symmetry and justice in the universe. Maybe there is such a thing as karma after all.

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2009/10/27/requiem-for-a-quack-part-ii/

How and Why of Everything

Pages

Total Pageviews

Friday, March 14, 2014

I want to get married with girl 30 years younger than me.

I want to date a girl who's over 30 years younger than me. Is that wrong?

I want to date a girl who's over 30 years younger than me. Is that wrong?

Best AnswerVoter's Choice

Source:

Other Answers (9)

Source(s):

Asparagus and Cancer: Is the Myth Real?

The Positives of Asparagus

Leukemia vs. Asparagus

In the End

Sunday, February 23, 2014

"American aircraft carriers were attacked by strange disc-shaped aircraft with Nazi crosses on the side"

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Requiem for a quack, part II: Hulda Clark, author of The Cure for All Cancers, died of cancer.